Directors to face identity checks under Companies House reforms
Companies House has published further guidance on the introduction of mandatory identity verification for company directors and other individuals involved in company filings. The change forms part of the reforms introduced by the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023. What do you need to know?
Under the new regime, company directors, people with significant control and individuals who file documents at Companies House will be required to verify their identity. The aim is to improve the accuracy of the Companies House register and prevent misuse of company structures for fraud and other economic crime. Identity verification will be possible in two ways. You will be able to complete the process directly through Companies House using its digital verification system, or you can verify your identity through an authorised corporate service provider, such as an accountant or company formation agent.
The verification requirement will be introduced in stages. Once the system is fully implemented, new directors will need to complete identity verification before their appointment can be registered. Existing directors will be given a transition period to comply with the new rules. For business owners, the practical impact is that company filings will increasingly be tied to verified identities. Directors who fail to complete the process may find they are unable to make filings or act for the company through the Companies House system. You should therefore monitor Companies House guidance and announcements and ensure directors are prepared for the new verification requirements.
Related Topics
-
EVs and the tax-free mileage allowance
You’re a director and regularly use your electric vehicle (EV) for business journeys. Your company provides a workplace charger which is free for all staff to use. Does the origin of the electricity impact your claim for tax-free mileage?
-
HMRC loses employment status case involving football referees
HMRC has lost another employment status case, this time involving football referees engaged by Professional Game Match Officials Ltd (PGMOL). The tribunal rejected HMRC’s argument that the referees should be treated as employees for tax purposes. Why does the decision matter?
-
Investing: loans vs shares
You have the opportunity to invest in a promising start-up company. You can either purchase shares or lend it the money. What are the potential tax consequences you need to factor in when making your decision?
This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.