Hidden MTD news in Spring Statement documents
Chancellor Rachel Reeves kept her pledge that there would be no more tax rises at the Spring Statement, but there are some important Making Tax Digital developments hidden away in the tax related documents. What do you need to know?
The timetable for Making Tax Digital for Income Tax Self-Assessment (MTD ITSA) includes mandating sole traders and landlords with revenue exceeding £50,000 from April 2026, then £30,000 the following year. The government has published a technical note alongside the Spring Statement documents that provide further details on the measures. The note includes the following key points:
- The mandation threshold will fall to £20,000 from April 2028 for sole traders and landlords;
- Exempting certain taxpayers from MTD, including non-UK resident entertainers and sportspeople with no other income sources;
- Deferring mandation from ministers of religion, Lloyds underwriters, and recipients of the married couples’ allowance (note that this is not the same as the marriage allowance, and is only relevant where one of the couple was born before 6 April 1935) and blind persons’ allowance until after the end of the current parliament;
- Confirmation that eligible software will be mandatory – there will be no filing service provided by HMRC for the end of year confirmation.
There is still no certainty of if and/or when taxpayers with income below £20,000 will be brought within MTD ITSA. The note simply says “As part of the ongoing rollout of MTD, the government will continue to explore how we can best bring the benefits of digitalisation to a greater proportion of the 4 million sole traders and landlords who have income below the £20,000 threshold.”
Related Topics
-
EVs and the tax-free mileage allowance
You’re a director and regularly use your electric vehicle (EV) for business journeys. Your company provides a workplace charger which is free for all staff to use. Does the origin of the electricity impact your claim for tax-free mileage?
-
HMRC loses employment status case involving football referees
HMRC has lost another employment status case, this time involving football referees engaged by Professional Game Match Officials Ltd (PGMOL). The tribunal rejected HMRC’s argument that the referees should be treated as employees for tax purposes. Why does the decision matter?
-
Investing: loans vs shares
You have the opportunity to invest in a promising start-up company. You can either purchase shares or lend it the money. What are the potential tax consequences you need to factor in when making your decision?


This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.